Volkswagen Passat 1997 vs Audi 80 1993
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat engine produces 20 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Audi 80. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1600 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 80 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi A6, Seat Alhambra, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A6, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Alhambra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Passat might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi 80 1993 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Audi 80 1993 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is larger. Volkswagen Passat is 19 cm longer than the Audi 80, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1200 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Passat has 125 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi 80. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Audi 80 has
| |