Volkswagen Passat 1997 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997

 
Volkswagen Passat
1997 - 2000
Volkswagen Sharan
1997 - 2000
Body: Estate car / wagonMinivan / MPV
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP110 HP
Torque: 210 NM235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16 seconds19.1 seconds
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Despite less power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.77.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Passat consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 920 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1170 km on highway
890 km with real consumption1000 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.62 m
Width: 1.74 m1.81 m
Height: 1.50 m1.73 m
Volkswagen Passat is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 23 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 495 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Passat can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9052`000
Safety:
Quality:
low

low
Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably better
Average price (€): 10001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 7.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv