Volkswagen Passat and Audi 80 have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Passat torque is 8 NM more than Audi 80. Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
6.7
6.3
Real fuel consumption:
6.9 l/100km
7.4 l/100km
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80.
Fuel tank capacity:
62 litres
66 litres
Full fuel tank distance:
920 km in combined cycle
1040 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway
1600 km on highway
890 km with real consumption
890 km with real consumption
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Audi 80 1993 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Audi 80 1993 1.9 engine
Dimensions
Length:
4.67 m
4.48 m
Width:
1.74 m
1.70 m
Height:
1.50 m
1.41 m
Volkswagen Passat is larger. Volkswagen Passat is 19 cm longer than the Audi 80, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:
495 litres
370 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down
no data
1200 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Passat has 125 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80.
Turning diameter:
11 meters
11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi 80.
Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably significantly better
