Volkswagen Passat 1997 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1998

 
Volkswagen Passat
1997 - 2000
Volkswagen Sharan
1998 - 2000
Body: Estate car / wagonMinivan / MPV
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 210 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 seconds12.8 seconds
Volkswagen Passat and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.410.9
Real fuel consumption: 9.2 l/100km10.7 l/100km
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Passat consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway850 km on highway
670 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 9 years9 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.62 m
Width: 1.74 m1.81 m
Height: 1.50 m1.73 m
Volkswagen Passat is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 23 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 495 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Passat can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8701`900
Safety:
Quality:
low

low
Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably better
Average price (€): 10001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 7.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv