Volkswagen Passat 2014 vs Skoda Superb 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 240 HP | 140 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 500 NM | 250 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 11 seconds | 6.5 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 6.3 | 4.6 - 9.3 | |
|
Volkswagen Passat petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Superb. On average, Volkswagen Passat equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Passat is 7 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 651 litres | 603 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat has 48 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Superb. The Skoda Superb may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`094 | ~ 2`141 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |