Volkswagen Passat 2010 vs Volvo V60 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 3.6 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | 1.6 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 300 HP | 115 - 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 350 NM | 240 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 - 12.5 seconds | 6.2 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 9.3 | 4.5 - 10.2 | |
|
Volkswagen Passat petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V60. On average, Volkswagen Passat equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
| Volkswagen Passat is 15 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Passat has 173 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`158 | ~ 2`129 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo V60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 6800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 9.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |