Volkswagen Passat 2010 vs Skoda Superb 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 3.6 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | 1.4 - 3.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 - 300 HP | 125 - 260 HP | |
Torque: | 200 - 350 NM | 200 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 - 12.5 seconds | 6.6 - 10.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 9.3 | 5.9 - 10.2 | |
Volkswagen Passat petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Superb. On average, Volkswagen Passat equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.51 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Passat is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 633 litres | |
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Volkswagen Passat has 30 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Volkswagen Passat can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`158 | ~ 2`143 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 5400 | 7800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |