Volkswagen Passat 2000 vs Volkswagen Bora 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Passat
2000 - 2005
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 4.01.6 - 2.8

Performance

Power: 100 - 275 HP100 - 204 HP
Torque: 148 - 370 NM145 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 - 15 seconds7.6 - 13.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 13.05.2 - 11.0
Volkswagen Passat petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Bora. On average, Volkswagen Passat equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.68 m4.41 m
Width: 1.75 m1.74 m
Height: 1.50 m1.47 m
Volkswagen Passat is larger.
Volkswagen Passat is 27 cm longer than the Volkswagen Bora, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 495 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1470 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Passat has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Bora.
Turning diameter: 12 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Bora, which means Volkswagen Passat can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`080~ 1`881
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 14001600
Rating in user reviews: 7.9/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Bora has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv