Volkswagen Passat 1997 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volkswagen Passat is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volkswagen Passat also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.8 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 193 HP | 140 - 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 310 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 16 seconds | 10.6 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 11.0 | 6.7 - 10.1 | |
|
Volkswagen Passat petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, a Volkswagen Passat with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.71 m | |
| Volkswagen Passat is 6 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Passat has 32 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Volkswagen Passat uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Volkswagen Passat can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`999 | ~ 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |