Volkswagen Passat 1985 vs Ford Sierra 1987
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Volkswagen Passat is available only with front wheel drive, while Ford Sierra can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.3 - 2.2 | 1.6 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 54 - 136 HP | 67 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 100 - 184 NM | 120 - 229 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 25.2 seconds | 8.8 - 19.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 10.3 | 6.7 - 11.6 | |
Volkswagen Passat petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Sierra. On average, Volkswagen Passat equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Passat and Ford Sierra are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 1 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Volkswagen Passat can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`267 | ~ 1`257 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |