Volkswagen Passat 2000 vs Volvo S60 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Passat
2000 - 2005
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 4.02.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 100 - 275 HP126 - 300 HP
Torque: 148 - 370 NM192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.5 - 14 seconds5.7 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.4 - 13.06.4 - 13.0
On average, the Volkswagen Passat petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volvo S60. On average, Volkswagen Passat equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.59 m
Width: 1.75 m1.80 m
Height: 1.46 m1.43 m
Volkswagen Passat is 12 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 475 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Passat has 51 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 12 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Volkswagen Passat can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`046~ 2`031
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 14003200
Rating in user reviews: 7.9/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv