Volkswagen Passat 2005 vs Volvo S60 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Passat
2005 - 2010
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 3.22.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 102 - 250 HP126 - 300 HP
Torque: 148 - 350 NM192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 - 13 seconds5.7 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.6 - 9.86.4 - 13.0
Volkswagen Passat petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, Volkswagen Passat equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.59 m
Width: 1.82 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.43 m
Volkswagen Passat is larger.
Volkswagen Passat is 18 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 565 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Passat has 141 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 1.6 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Volkswagen Passat can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`060~ 2`031
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 22003200
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv