Volkswagen Up! 2016 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Up! is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Up! engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Citigo, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Skoda Citigo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Up! reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
| By specification Volkswagen Up! consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Up! could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volkswagen Up! is 4 cm longer than the Skoda Citigo, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Up! is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 251 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`360 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Up! has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Up!, so Volkswagen Up! quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Up! has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |