Volkswagen Up! 2016 vs Volkswagen Polo 2014

 
Volkswagen Up!
2016 -
Volkswagen Polo
2014 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 75 HP90 HP
Torque: 95 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.5 seconds10.9 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Up! engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 135 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Up! reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.13.4
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km4.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Up! consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Up! could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Up! consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle1320 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway1450 km on highway
640 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.60 m3.97 m
Width: 1.64 m1.68 m
Height: 1.50 m1.45 m
Volkswagen Up! is smaller, but higher.
Volkswagen Up! is 37 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Up! is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 251 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data952 litres
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Up! has 29 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Up! is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Up! can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3301`670
Safety:
Volkswagen Polo scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Polo scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Up! has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 66006000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Up! has
  • better manoeuvrability
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv