Volkswagen Up! 2016 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Citigo is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Up! engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Citigo, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Up! reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
| By specification Volkswagen Up! consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Up! over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volkswagen Up! is 4 cm longer than the Skoda Citigo, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Up! is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 251 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`330 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Up! has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Up!, so Volkswagen Up! quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Up! has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |