Volkswagen Up! 2016 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Up! engine produces 11 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, but torque is 7 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Up! reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Up! consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Up! over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Up! consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Volkswagen Up! is smaller. Volkswagen Up! is 20 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
959 litres | 912 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Space Star may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Up! (by 47 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Up! is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Volkswagen Up! can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`330 kg | 1`290 kg | |
| Net weight: | 859 kg | 845 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 471 kg | 445 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Up! has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |