Volkswagen Up! 2012 vs Chevrolet Spark 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 LPG | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Spark is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Up! and Chevrolet Spark have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Up! torque is 3 NM less than Chevrolet Spark. Volkswagen Up! reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.1 | |
|
The Volkswagen Up! is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Up! consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Up! over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
| Volkswagen Up! is 10 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Spark, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Up! is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 213 litres | 170 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Up! has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Up! has 43 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Spark. The Chevrolet Spark may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Up! is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Spark. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`370 | 1`355 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Volkswagen Up! has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Spark has serious deffects in 130 percent more cases than Volkswagen Up!, so Volkswagen Up! quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Up! has
|
Chevrolet Spark has
| |