Volkswagen Up! 2012 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Up! and Skoda Citigo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Up! consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Up! could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Up! is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Citigo, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Up! is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 251 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Up! has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Up!, so Volkswagen Up! quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Up! has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |