Volkswagen Up! 2012 vs Chevrolet Spark 2010

 
Volkswagen Up!
2012 - 2016
Chevrolet Spark
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP81 HP
Torque: 95 NM111 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds12.1 seconds
Chevrolet Spark is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Up! engine produces 6 HP less power than Chevrolet Spark, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Chevrolet Spark. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Up! reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.75.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km6.2 l/100km
The Volkswagen Up! is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Up! consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Up! over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Up! consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway830 km on highway
640 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Up! gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.54 m3.64 m
Width: 1.64 m1.60 m
Height: 1.49 m1.52 m
Volkswagen Up! is 10 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Spark, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Up! is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 251 litres170 litres
Volkswagen Up! has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Up! has 81 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Spark. The Chevrolet Spark may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Up! is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Spark.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2901`360
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

low
Volkswagen Up! has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Spark has serious deffects in 130 percent more cases than Volkswagen Up!, so Volkswagen Up! quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 46003200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Up! has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Chevrolet Spark has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv