Volkswagen Up! 2016 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 90 HP | 71 - 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 160 NM | 88 - 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 15.3 seconds | 11.7 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.4 | 4.1 - 4.2 | |
|
On average, the Volkswagen Up! petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mitsubishi Space Star. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Volkswagen Up! is smaller. Volkswagen Up! is 20 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 912 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Up! has 16 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The Mitsubishi Space Star may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Up! is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Volkswagen Up! can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`336 | ~ 1`333 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Up! has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |