Volkswagen Up! 2012 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 60 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 - 95 NM | 108 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 - 16.3 seconds | 10.4 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 4.7 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Up! petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Volkswagen Up! is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Up! is 43 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Volkswagen Up! has 29 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Up! is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Up! can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`306 | ~ 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Up! has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |