Volkswagen Touareg 2010 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Touareg engine produces 5 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Despite less power, Volkswagen Touareg reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Touareg is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Touareg consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Touareg over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touareg consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Volkswagen Touareg is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touareg is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1642 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`860 | 3`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touareg has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |