Volkswagen Tiguan 2023 vs Skoda Octavia 2013
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Hybrid | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Volkswagen Tiguan) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Skoda Octavia), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 25 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, but torque is 30 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 4.0 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 7.30 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volkswagen Tiguan is 12 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Tiguan is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 652 litres | 610 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1650 litres | 1740 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Skoda Octavia may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 90 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Volkswagen Tiguan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`110 kg | 1`907 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`598 kg | 1`337 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 512 kg | 570 kg | |
| Volkswagen Tiguan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Skoda Octavia. Therefore, Skoda Octavia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 35 800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |