Volkswagen Tiguan 2019 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 119 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Tiguan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is smaller. Volkswagen Tiguan is 20 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 16 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1655 litres | 1432 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Tiguan has 110 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 223 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`470 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 29 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |