Volkswagen Tiguan 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 75 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Tiguan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is smaller. Volkswagen Tiguan is 20 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1655 litres | 1432 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 223 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`190 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 22 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |