Volkswagen Tiguan 2016 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 60 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Tiguan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2017: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Tiguan is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Tiguan is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1655 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Tiguan has 109 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 35 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`143 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volkswagen Tiguan scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Tiguan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Tiguan, so Volkswagen Tiguan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 27 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |