Volkswagen Tiguan 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Tiguan could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Tiguan is 20 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Tiguan is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1655 litres | 1432 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 223 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`310 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 22 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |