Volkswagen Tiguan 2010 vs Audi Q5 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 30 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Tiguan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A4, Seat Altea, Audi A5, Seat Leon, Seat Exeo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Tiguan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Tiguan 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Tiguan 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Tiguan is 20 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Tiguan is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1510 litres | 1560 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Tiguan has 70 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |