Volkswagen Tiguan 2009 vs BMW X3 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 3 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 30 NM less than BMW X3. Despite less power, Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Tiguan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 67 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
1330 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
910 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Tiguan engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 18 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Volkswagen Tiguan 2009 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Tiguan 2009 2.0 engine BMW X3 2009 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW X3 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
Volkswagen Tiguan is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Tiguan is 14 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Tiguan is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 480 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1510 litres | 1560 litres | |
Volkswagen Tiguan has 10 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 50 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.3 metres more than that of the BMW X3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 2`265 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
BMW X3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than BMW X3, so BMW X3 quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 7200 | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
BMW X3 has
| |