Volkswagen Tiguan 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 50 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 88 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Tiguan could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Tiguan is 9 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1510 litres | 955 litres | |
| Volkswagen Tiguan has 86 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 555 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |