Volkswagen Tiguan 2015 vs Renault Koleos 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 23 HP less power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Koleos. Despite less power, Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Tiguan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Koleos 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is smaller. Volkswagen Tiguan is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Koleos, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Tiguan is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1655 litres | 1380 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Renault Koleos may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 275 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`170 kg | 2`300 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`560 kg | 1`784 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 610 kg | 516 kg | |
| Volkswagen Tiguan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Renault Koleos. Therefore, Volkswagen Tiguan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Tiguan is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Koleos scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |