Volkswagen Tiguan 2015 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Tiguan could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Tiguan is 4 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Tiguan is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1655 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Tiguan has 143 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 177 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Volkswagen Tiguan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`170 kg | 1`946 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`560 kg | 1`415 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 610 kg | 531 kg | |
| Volkswagen Tiguan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Renault Kadjar. Therefore, Volkswagen Tiguan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |