Volkswagen Tiguan 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is smaller. Volkswagen Tiguan is 20 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Tiguan is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1655 litres | 1432 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Tiguan has 110 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 223 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 29 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |