Volkswagen Tiguan 2011 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 30 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Tiguan could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Tiguan is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Tiguan is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1510 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Tiguan has 7 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 110 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Volkswagen Tiguan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`220 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |