Volkswagen Tiguan 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 30 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Tiguan could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Tiguan is 15 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Tiguan is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1510 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Volkswagen Tiguan has 119 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 159 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |