Volkswagen Tiguan 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Volkswagen Tiguan) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Honda CR-V) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 40 HP more power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 60 NM less than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Tiguan could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Tiguan is 14 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Tiguan is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1510 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Volkswagen Tiguan has 119 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 159 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |