Volkswagen Tiguan 2007 vs Ford Kuga 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 - 200 HP | 136 - 200 HP | |
Torque: | 240 - 350 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 11.9 seconds | 8.2 - 10.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 9.9 | 5.3 - 10.3 | |
Volkswagen Tiguan petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Volkswagen Tiguan equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.44 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Tiguan is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 410 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1510 litres | no data | |
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Tiguan has 60 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Volkswagen Tiguan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`189 | ~ 2`130 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 7200 | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |