Volkswagen Tiguan 2011 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 210 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 380 NM | 210 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 11.9 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.6 | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. On average, a Volkswagen Tiguan with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Tiguan is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Tiguan is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1510 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Tiguan has 35 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 110 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Volkswagen Tiguan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`174 | ~ 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |