Volkswagen T-Roc 2020 vs Ford Fusion 2005
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen T-Roc engine produces 35 HP more power than Ford Fusion, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Ford Fusion. Thanks to more power Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen T-Roc is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion, which means that by driving the Volkswagen T-Roc over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen T-Roc gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is larger. Volkswagen T-Roc is 21 cm longer than the Ford Fusion, 10 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | 1175 litres | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen T-Roc has 108 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fusion. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen T-Roc (by 115 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Roc is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Fusion, which means Volkswagen T-Roc can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Roc has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |