Volkswagen T-Roc 2018 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc and Seat Ateca have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen T-Roc is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen T-Roc could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Seat Ateca 2016 1.4 engine: The 1.4 TSI engine from the EA211 family (code CZEA, 150 hp) is a modern turbocharged unit designed to balance performance and efficiency. It features direct fuel injection, a timing belt drive, and the ACT cylinder deactivation system, which shuts down two cylinders under light load to reduce fuel consumption. In everyday use the engine offers good ... More about Seat Ateca 2016 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.60 m | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc is 11 cm shorter than the Seat Ateca, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1290 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Volkswagen T-Roc has 65 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Roc is 0.3 metres more than that of the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`860 kg | 1`910 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`350 kg | 1`289 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 621 kg | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Seat Ateca. Therefore, Seat Ateca is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ateca has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Roc has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |