Volkswagen T-Roc 2018 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen T-Roc engine produces 13 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, but torque is 10 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Despite less power, Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen T-Roc is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Volkswagen T-Roc over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 161 mm (6.3 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Qashqai version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Nissan Qashqai 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.59 m | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen T-Roc has 15 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The Nissan Qashqai may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 295 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Roc is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Volkswagen T-Roc can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Roc has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |