Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen T-Roc engine produces 13 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, but torque is 10 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Despite less power, Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen T-Roc is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Volkswagen T-Roc over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.59 m | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1585 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Roc is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Volkswagen T-Roc can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`860 kg | 1`900 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`350 kg | 1`315 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 585 kg | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Nissan Qashqai. Therefore, Nissan Qashqai is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Roc has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |