Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 vs Seat Ateca 2016

 
Volkswagen T-Roc
2017 - 2018
Seat Ateca
2016 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 340 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds8.5 seconds
Volkswagen T-Roc and Seat Ateca have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.14.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km6.5 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen T-Roc could require 105 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1070 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
870 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.23 m4.34 m
Width: 1.82 m1.81 m
Height: 1.57 m1.60 m
Volkswagen T-Roc is 11 cm shorter than the Seat Ateca, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data510 litres
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Roc is 0.3 metres more than that of the Seat Ateca.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0401`970
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

average
Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ateca has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 21 40021 800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen T-Roc has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
Seat Ateca has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv