Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc and Nissan Qashqai have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen T-Roc is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Volkswagen T-Roc over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.60 m | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1598 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Roc is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Volkswagen T-Roc can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`040 kg | 2`110 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`530 kg | 1`580 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 530 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Roc has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |