Volkswagen T-Roc 2018 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc and Volkswagen Tiguan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen T-Roc is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Volkswagen T-Roc over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 161 mm (6.3 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Tiguan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is smaller. Volkswagen T-Roc is 26 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1290 litres | 1655 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Volkswagen T-Roc has 170 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 365 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Roc is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Volkswagen T-Roc can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`920 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`415 kg | 1`585 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 505 kg | 725 kg | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 44 procentiem less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Therefore, Volkswagen Tiguan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Roc has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |