Volkswagen T-Roc 2018 vs Toyota RAV4 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volkswagen T-Roc) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota RAV4) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen T-Roc engine produces 25 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 132 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite less power, Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen T-Roc is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Volkswagen T-Roc over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen T-Roc gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 161 mm (6.3 inches) | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota RAV4 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is smaller. Volkswagen T-Roc is 37 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | 1690 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Volkswagen T-Roc has 135 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 400 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Roc is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`105 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 27 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Roc has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |