Volkswagen T-Roc 2018 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc and Seat Ateca have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen T-Roc is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that by driving the Volkswagen T-Roc over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc is 11 cm shorter than the Seat Ateca, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1290 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Volkswagen T-Roc has 40 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Roc is 0.3 metres more than that of the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`020 kg | 2`100 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`505 kg | 1`473 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 515 kg | 627 kg | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Seat Ateca. Therefore, Seat Ateca is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ateca has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Roc has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |