Volkswagen T-Roc 2018 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen T-Roc engine produces 75 HP more power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Mazda CX-3. Thanks to more power Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.9 | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen T-Roc could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen T-Roc gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.54 m | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 392 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1237 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda CX-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 23 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`060 kg | 1`780 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`480 kg | 1`261 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 580 kg | 519 kg | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Mazda CX-3. Therefore, Volkswagen T-Roc is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-3 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Roc has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |