Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen T-Roc engine produces 68 HP more power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Skoda Yeti. Thanks to more power Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Volkswagen T-Roc over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is larger, but lower. Volkswagen T-Roc is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1237 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen T-Roc has 40 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Roc is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Volkswagen T-Roc can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Roc has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |