Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen T-Roc engine produces 68 HP more power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Skoda Yeti. Thanks to more power Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Volkswagen T-Roc over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is larger, but lower. Volkswagen T-Roc is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1237 litres | 1665 litres | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has 40 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 428 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Roc is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Volkswagen T-Roc can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`990 kg | 1`940 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`429 kg | 1`280 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 561 kg | 660 kg | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Skoda Yeti. Therefore, Skoda Yeti is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Roc has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |