Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen T-Roc engine produces 27 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen T-Roc could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.59 m | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1237 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen T-Roc has 15 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The Nissan Qashqai may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 348 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Roc is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Volkswagen T-Roc can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Roc has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |